Collective forecast

Synthesized
23%

Very Unlikely

Labeled AGI23%
Not labeled AGI77%
Confidencelow· ▼ news bearish

Single market source with low trading volume — no second market to cross-check against.

Based on 1 prediction market

90% range 1535% · moderate uncertainty (a thin, low-agreement signal)

The market's probability of 23.2% for the first announced AGI being considered AGI contrasts with the forecasted 15% likelihood of any AI lab's system being labeled AGI before 2030.

Forecast update

Updated 19d ago

Jul 11range 22.224.2Jul 20

Probability unchanged this week.

2 new supporting signals

Assumption strengthened — Current trends in AI development continue without major disruptions.

Assumption strengthened — The definitions and criteria for AGI remain consistent among major labs.

Assumption weakened — Current trends in AI development and investment continue without major disruptions.

Assumption weakened — No major breakthroughs in AI technology occur that significantly alter the landscape.

Assumption weakened — The definitions and criteria for AGI recognition remain consistent among major labs.

Why this forecast

The market indicates a low probability of a system being labeled AGI by a major lab before 2030, with only 23.2% of users agreeing that the first announced AGI will be considered AGI. Recent news suggests that major figures in AI, like Alexandre LeBrun, are hesitant to label their systems as AGI, which supports the market's skepticism.

Statistically pooled from 1 matched market (log-odds weighted by volume), 90% CI 14-35%.

Key development

Major AI leaders are avoiding the AGI label, indicating a cautious approach to defining AGI.

Supporting signals

  • Industry leaders are hesitant to label their systems as AGI, reflecting a cautious approach.
  • Predictions of human-level AI do not equate to AGI, indicating a gap in expectations.

Risk factors

  • A major breakthrough in AI could lead to a sudden shift in labeling.
  • Changes in public perception or regulatory frameworks could influence definitions.

This forecast assumes

  • Current trends in AI development continue without major disruptions.
  • The definitions and criteria for AGI remain consistent among major labs.

How this could unfold

Increased scrutiny on AI capabilities
Ongoing debates about the definition of AGI
Cautious approaches from leading AI labs
Labeled AGI (23%)
Potential delays in AGI development
Increased focus on ethical AI practices
Continued public skepticism about AI capabilities

Explore

Run the simulation

Replay this forecast 1,000 times, drawing from its own uncertainty band each time — watch how often labeled agi actually happens.

Build a scenario

Toggle the assumptions this forecast depends on, stack as many as you like, and run them together.

Current trends in AI development continue without major disruptions.
The definitions and criteria for AGI remain consistent among major labs.